When comparing .380 vs 9mm, factors like cartridge confidence, concealability and felt recoil play major roles. While I prefer 9mm for its versatility and power, many people choose .380 for its lighter recoil and compact design. The decision often comes down to personal preference, your self-defense needs and what you’re comfortable shooting. In this comparison of 9mm vs .380 handguns, we’ll explore key differences to help you decide which is best for self-defense.
.380 ACP Overview
The .380 ACP (Automatic Colt Pistol) was introduced by John Browning in 1908 and has since become a popular choice for concealed carry. Its compact size and relatively low recoil make it an attractive option for those who prioritize ease of carry and handling over raw stopping power.
- Bullet Weight: Typically ranges from 90 to 100 grains
- Muzzle Velocity: 950-1000 feet per second (depending on load)
- Recoil: Light, easy for most shooters to control
- Common Use: Best suited for close-range self-defense and concealed carry
9mm Luger Overview
The 9mm Luger, introduced in 1902, has become the standard for military, law enforcement and civilian self-defense handguns around the world. Known for its balance of manageable recoil and impressive stopping power, the 9mm is a versatile round that performs well in both compact and full-sized firearms.
- Bullet Weight: Typically ranges from 115 to 147 grains
- Muzzle Velocity: 1,100-1,250 feet per second (depending on load)
- Recoil: Moderate, but manageable for most shooters
- Common Use: Ideal for a range of applications from concealed carry to duty weapons
.380 vs 9mm
When comparing the ballistics of .380 ACP and 9mm Luger, several key differences become clear. The .380 ACP generally delivers around 200 foot-pounds of muzzle energy, making it a lighter round that is easier to control, especially for those sensitive to recoil. Its effective range is typically between 25 and 30 yards, which is adequate for most self-defense situations. One of the primary advantages of .380 ACP is its ease of handling. The reduced recoil and the lighter weight of firearms chambered in .380 ACP make it an attractive choice for people looking for a highly concealable and manageable handgun. However, the .380 ACP is not without its drawbacks. It offers lower stopping power compared to larger calibers, and its penetration is limited, particularly when faced with heavy clothing or barriers.
On the other hand, the 9mm Luger stands out for its superior ballistic performance. With muzzle energy ranging between 350 and 450 foot-pounds, it delivers significantly more power, making it a more potent option for self-defense. Its effective range extends to 50 yards or more, providing a greater reach and versatility in defensive situations. The 9mm’s key advantages include its greater stopping power and ability to penetrate barriers more effectively. Additionally, 9mm ammunition is widely available and generally affordable, making it a popular choice for both law enforcement and civilian use. However, this increased power comes with slightly more recoil, which can be a consideration for shooters who are less experienced or more recoil-sensitive. Moreover, 9mm handguns tend to be heavier than their .380 ACP counterparts, which may make them less comfortable for extended concealed carry.
.380 and 9mm Subcompacts Comparison
I chose guns based on availability, and these guns are not intended to be an exhaustive list. For the .380 handguns, I compared the Glock 42, the Kimber Micro .380, the SIG Sauer P238 and my venerable Walther PPK/S. For the 9mm handguns, I compared the Glock 43, the Kimber Micro 9, the SIG P938 and the Smith & Wesson M&P9 Shield.
I drew all firearms specifications from manufacturer websites. I tested each gun using a LabRadar chronograph, shooting four different ammo brands and types — again, not an exhaustive list but rather chosen by availability and including one defensive round for comparative purposes. For each velocity test, I measured four magazines of six shots each for a total of 24 rounds of each ammo from each gun. Average velocity in feet per second at muzzle and energy measured in foot-pound force are reported below. Finally, I shot each gun twice at 7 yards, on signal and from low ready, using seven rounds as quickly as I could shoot while maintaining front-sight focus. The goal was defensive accuracy.
Tested Handgun Specifications
| Handgun | Weight | Height | Overall length | Barrel length | Caliber | Capacity | Trigger pull | Felt recoil | Sights | *Cost |
| Glock 42 | 13.76 ounces | 4.13 inches | 5.94 inches | 3.25 inches | .380 ACP | 6 | ~ 5.5 pounds | Reasonable | Stock | $470 |
| Kimber Micro | 13.4 ounces | 4 inches | 5.6 inches | 2.75 inches | .380 ACP | 6 | ~ 7 pounds | Reasonable | Night | $1,013 |
| SIG Sauer P238 | 15.2 ounces | 3.9 inches | 5.5 inches | 2.7 inches | .380 ACP | 6 | ~ 7.5 pounds | Reasonable | White Dot | $692 |
| Walther PPK/S | 22.1 ounces | 3.8 inches | 6.1 inches | 3.3 inches | .380 ACP | 6 | ~ 6.1 pounds | Harder | Steel | $699 |
| Glock 43 | 17.95 ounces | 4.25 inches | 6.26 inches | 3.39 inches | 9mm | 6 | ~ 5.5 pounds | Reasonable | Stock | $499.99 |
| Kimber Micro 9 | 15.6 ounces | 4.07 inches | 6.1 inches | 3.15 inches | 9mm | 6 | ~ 7.5 pounds | Reasonable | White Dot | $699.99 |
| SIG Sauer P938 | 16 ounces | 3.9 inches | 5.9 inches | 3 inches | 9mm | 7 | ~ 7 pounds | Reasonable | White Dot | $749.99 |
| S&W M&P9 Shield | 20.8 ounces | 4.5 inches | 6.1 inches | 3.1 inches | 9mm | 7 | ~ 6.5 pounds | Harder | White Dot | $449.99 |
*Costs were obtained from the same Big-Box retailer.
.380 Subcompacts: Ballistic Data
| Handgun | Ammo | Feet per Second | Foot-pounds |
| Glock 42 | SIG Sauer .380 ACP 100-grain FMJ | 883 | 173 |
| PMC .380 ACP 90-grain FMJ | 896 | 160 | |
| Armscor .380 ACP 95-grain FMJ | 929 | 182 | |
| Hornady .380 ACP 90-grain XTP | 900 | 162 | |
| Kimber Micro | SIG Sauer .380 ACP 100-grain FMJ | 870 | 168 |
| PMC .380 ACP 90-grain FMJ | 887 | 157 | |
| Armscor .380 ACP 95-grain FMJ | 905 | 173 | |
| Hornady .380 ACP 90-grain XTP | 890 | 158 | |
| SIG Sauer P238 | SIG Sauer .380 ACP 100-grain FMJ | 862 | 165 |
| PMC .380 ACP 90-grain FMJ | 882 | 155 | |
| Armscor .380 ACP 95-grain FMJ | 896 | 169 | |
| Hornady .380 ACP 90-grain XTP | 878 | 154 | |
| Walther PPK/S | SIG Sauer .380 ACP 100-grain FMJ | 866 | 166 |
| PMC .380 ACP 90-grain FMJ | 872 | 152 | |
| Armscor .380 ACP 95-grain FMJ | 901 | 171 | |
| Hornady .380 ACP 90-grain XTP | 884 | 156 |
9mm Subcompacts: Ballistic Data
| Handgun | Ammo | Feet per Second | Foot-pounds |
| Glock 43 | Blazer Brass 9mm 115-grain FMJ | 1,043 | 278 |
| Lawman 9mm 115-grain FMJ | 1,137 | 330 | |
| IWI 9mm 115-grain HP | 1,146 | 335 | |
| Hornady 9mm 124-grain XTP | 1,058 | 308 | |
| Kimber Micro 9 | Blazer Brass 9mm 115-grain FMJ | 1,038 | 275 |
| Lawman 9mm 115-grain FMJ | 1,123 | 322 | |
| IWI 9mm 115-grain HP | 1,103 | 311 | |
| Hornady 9mm 124-grain XTP | 1,049 | 303 | |
| SIG Sauer P938 | Blazer Brass 9mm 115-grain FMJ | 1,016 | 264 |
| Lawman 9mm 115-grain FMJ | 1,114 | 317 | |
| IWI 9mm 115-grain HP | 1,099 | 308 | |
| Hornady 9mm 124-grain XTP | 1,033 | 294 | |
| S&W M&P9 Shield | Blazer Brass 9mm 115-grain FMJ | 1,019 | 265 |
| Lawman 9mm 115-grain FMJ | 1,100 | 309 | |
| IWI 9mm 115-grain HP | 1,109 | 314 | |
| Hornady 9mm 124-grain XTP | 1,034 | 294 |
The felt recoil reported in the chart above was my own perceptions and was comparable over all eight guns. I personally do not detect a big difference in felt recoil from the .380s to the 9mms. For me, the additional 1 to 4 ounces in weight and slightly longer barrels in the 9mm subcompacts balance the higher foot-pounds of the 9mm into a similar experience of felt recoil. Across all tested guns, I found the Walther PPK .380 to deliver the hardest felt recoil, and I felt muzzle flip was slightly more noticeable with the S&W M&P9 9mm. I otherwise found the guns to have fairly similar felt recoil.
Across all brands of ammo, including Hornady XTP in both .380 and 9mm, the Glocks shot with the highest velocities and thus were also harder-hitting in terms of actual force delivered into their targets, though these differences were relatively small and not statistically significant. When comparing the ballistics, the 9mm outperforms the .380 ACP in terms of power and effectiveness at longer distances. However, the .380 still provides sufficient energy for close-range defense, especially in situations where you need a lighter, more concealable handgun.
9mm vs. 380 for Concealed Carry
One of the biggest reasons people choose the .380 ACP over the 9mm is the size and weight of the firearms chambered for these rounds. Guns chambered in .380 ACP are often smaller, lighter and easier to conceal, making them ideal for deep concealment or everyday carry.
- .380 ACP Handguns: Slim, lightweight and often easier to conceal in business or casual attire. Common models include the Glock 42, SIG Sauer P238 and Ruger LCP.
- 9mm Handguns: Still suitable for concealed carry but tend to be bulkier and heavier. However, advancements in 9mm subcompact designs, such as the Glock 43 and SIG P365, have made it easier to carry 9mm pistols for everyday use.
For shooters who prioritize a firearm that is barely noticeable and easy to carry all day, the .380 ACP might be the better choice. On the other hand, if you can handle a slightly heavier gun, the 9mm offers a significant increase in stopping power without drastically increasing size.
Recoil and Accuracy: What to Expect
When it comes to recoil, the .380 ACP has a clear advantage. Its lighter bullets generate less recoil, making it easier for most people to shoot accurately, especially those with less experience or weaker hand strength. However, modern 9mm handguns are designed with recoil mitigation in mind, and most shooters find the recoil manageable, even with smaller 9mm pistols.
- .380 ACP Recoil: Light, making it easier for quick follow-up shots and prolonged practice sessions. Great for shooters with less hand strength or sensitivity to recoil.
- 9mm Recoil: Slightly more felt recoil, but manageable for most users. The heavier bullet can increase muzzle rise, but many 9mm pistols are designed to mitigate this effectively.
Self-Defense Considerations: .380 vs 9mm
Both .380 ACP and 9mm Luger can be effective for self-defense, but the choice depends on your individual needs. If you prioritize concealability, reduced recoil and lightweight carry, the .380 ACP might be the right fit. On the other hand, if stopping power and versatility are more important to you, the 9mm Luger is hard to beat.
.380 ACP for Self-Defense
When it comes to .380 ACP for self-defense, the caliber offers several advantages that make it appealing to many shooters, particularly beginners. One of the standout benefits is that .380 ACP handguns are generally easier to shoot, with lower recoil and a more manageable feel. This makes them a great option for those just starting out or for individuals who are sensitive to recoil. Additionally, .380 ACP firearms tend to be lightweight and compact, making them well-suited for close-quarters defense and for those who prioritize ease of carry and concealment in everyday use.
However, .380 ACP is not without its drawbacks. The primary concern for many is its reduced penetration compared to larger calibers. While sufficient for most self-defense scenarios, it may struggle to penetrate barriers such as car doors or heavy clothing, which could be a disadvantage in certain situations.
9mm for Self-Defense
On the other hand, 9mm is known for its superior stopping power, which makes it a popular choice for self-defense, law enforcement and military use. The 9mm round is more effective at longer ranges, giving it an edge in versatility across various scenarios. Whether you are concerned about self-defense in your home or while carrying concealed, the 9mm provides a balance of power and performance that is hard to beat. Its widespread availability and the variety of 9mm ammunition options also make it a versatile choice for shooters of all experience levels.
Despite these benefits, 9mm does come with a few cons. For one, it produces slightly more recoil than the .380 ACP, which might make it less ideal for new shooters or those looking for a softer shooting experience. Additionally, firearms chambered in 9mm tend to be larger and heavier than their .380 ACP counterparts, which could make them less comfortable for long-term concealed carry.
Which Caliber is Right for You: .380 vs 9mm?
In the debate of .380 vs 9mm, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Your choice should be based on what you’re comfortable carrying and shooting regularly. The .380 ACP is an excellent choice for those who want a lightweight, easy-to-carry firearm with minimal recoil. The 9mm Luger, on the other hand, offers more power and versatility, making it a top pick for those who need a bit more from their self-defense handgun.
Sources
LabRadar:MyLabRadar.com
Kimber:KimberAmerica.com
Glock:US.Glock.com
Smith & Wesson:Smith-Wesson.com
Walther:WaltherArms.com
SIG Sauer:SIGSauer.com
Hornady:Hornady.com
