Court casesthat shape yourSecond Amendmentrights
USCCA® and the Second Amendment Foundation are working together to help responsibly armed Americans understand the court cases and legal developments shaping the Second Amendment. Explore the cases we’re following, learn why they matter and sign up for updates as they develop.
Why It Matters
Protecting the Right Behind Responsible Self-Defense
Responsible self-defense starts with a choice, and that choice depends on a constitutional right. Without the Second Amendment, the freedom to protect yourself and the people you love does not exist.
By supporting SAF’s work, USCCA helps advance the protection of the right itself, while continuing its own mission of preparing people to exercise that right responsibly.
USCCA prepares the people.
Education, training and legal protection for responsibly armed Americans.
SAF protects the right.
Litigation and legal precedent defending the Second Amendment in the courts.
The Work of SAF
How SAF Defends the Right in Courts
While many organizations focus on legislation or elections, SAF’s work happens primarily in the courts — challenging unconstitutional laws, defending the rights of lawful gun owners, and building legal precedent meant to protect future generations.
2008
Heller
Recognized an individual right to possess firearms
2010
McDonald
Applied that protection to the states
2016
Caetano
Confirmed the right extends to modern arms
2022
Bruen
Confirmed the right to carry outside the home; established the history-and-tradition standard
Why case selection matters
Second Amendment cases can take years to move through the courts, with developments happening at the district, appellate, and Supreme Court levels. With more than 55 active cases across the country, SAF is involved in litigation at each level addressing important questions about the scope and protection of Second Amendment rights.
Before the Supreme Court
Second Amendment Cases We’re Following
- Cert Granted
Viramontes v. Cook County
U.S. Supreme Court, Docket No. 25-238
This case challenges Cook County’s ban on certain commonly owned semi-automatic rifles based on features such as pistol grips, telescoping stocks and muzzle brakes.
The Question
Does the Second Amendment protect the right to possess AR-15 platform and similar semi-automatic rifles that are commonly used for lawful purposes?
Why It Matters
Determines whether state and local governments can ban entire categories of commonly owned firearms based on their physical features. Similar bans exist in California, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Washington.
View Case DetailsCurrent Status
The Supreme Court granted review and consolidated the case with Grant v. Higgins for briefing and oral argument.
- Consolidated
Grant v. Higgins
U.S. Supreme Court, Docket No. 25-566 (consolidated with No. 25-238)
This case challenges Connecticut’s prohibition on certain semi-automatic rifles defined by name or specific features.
The Question
Can a state prohibit firearms that are commonly used for lawful purposes based on their functional or physical features?
Why It Matters
While Viramontes challenges a local ordinance, Grant challenges a state law using a similar framework. Together, the cases present the Supreme Court with two paths to address the same fundamental question: are commonly owned semi-automatic rifles protected by the Second Amendment?
View Case DetailsCurrent Status
Cert granted June 30, 2026, and consolidated with Viramontes. All future filings proceed under the Viramontes docket. Oral argument is expected this fall.
Second Amendment & Legal News Alerts
Follow what happens next
Rulings in Second Amendment cases can happen at a moment’s notice. Make sure you’re the first to know. Sign up for updates from USCCA on important legal developments, Second Amendment news, and issues relevant to responsibly armed Americans.
We respect your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Second Amendment & Legal News Alerts
You’re on the list
We’ll email you when there’s meaningful Second Amendment or legal news to share. In the meantime, take a look at the cases SAF is fighting right now.
Explore SAF’s Case MapThe Other Half of the Fight
You care about the right. We help you prepare to use it.
SAF fights in the courts to protect your right to self-defense. USCCA® exists for what comes after that right is secured: helping responsibly armed Americans train, prepare, and understand the responsibility that comes with it.
As a USCCA Member, you get world-class education, industry-leading training, and self-defense liability insurance0, all built around the idea that exercising your rights starts with being ready to do so responsibly and confidently.
If defending the Second Amendment matters to you, USCCA Membership is where that right becomes something you are actually ready to exercise.
See What USCCA Membership Includes →